Kenyans name out Kagame on third time period bid
The nation’s lawmakers started a nationwide tour final month to collect public opinions after each homes of Parliament voted in assist of a constitutional modification to permit Kagame a 3rd shot on the presidency.
Out of the “millions” of Rwandans consulted on the modification, “only 10 were against the idea”, the New Instances newspaper reported on Tuesday.
In the meantime, in Kenya, #SomeoneTellKagame was the highest trending matter on Twitter that very morning. It began Monday night when a Kenyan, Levi Kones (@levikones) tweeted Kagame, “I really hope sir, you will not ruin your legacy by being President for life.”
The response from Kagame’s account (@PaulKagame) was swift, and brutal: “Worry more about your own legacy… if you got any at all to think about!!” (sic).
By morning, and in typical Kenyan trend, Kenyans on Twitter had rallied to Kones’ defence, below the hashtag #SomeoneTellKagame.
It appears presumptuous, extreme, and even disrespectful for Kenyans to troll Kagame – in spite of everything, they don’t have a say in Rwandan politics. Actually, they shouldn’t even have an opinion on the third time period bid or Kagame’s legacy. Kones himself apologised to Kagame for the place he “may have spoken out of turn.”
If Rwandans resolve they need Kagame ceaselessly, that’s their enterprise. And the hashtag can be part of the ranks of the numerous that Kenyans on Twitter have began to defend a perceived slight on one in every of their very own, or the nation’s honour.
READ: Kenyans let their fingers do the speaking
KOT’s locus standi however, in a broader sense, the entire incident hints at frayed nerves across the third time period bid.
What gave it away is that Kagame truly responded to the tweet, coming from a “small person” in a rustic 1,000km away, whose view is totally inconsequential to the grand scheme of issues in Rwanda – Kagame has over 1 million followers, Levi Kones had lower than 690 when he despatched the “impertinent” tweet.
Although 99.999% of Rwandans say they assist his bid, replying to the tweet means that internally, Kagame could also be wrestling with some deep cognitive dissonance.
The constitutional manoeuvring essentially goes towards all the picture that he has so rigorously cultivated round himself over time – as an uncompromising stickler for the foundations, a person of his phrases, a “different” form of African president who has little need for the trimmings of energy.
Human minds have a low tolerance for important contradictions like that; the psychological misery shortly turns into overwhelming.
When a man is making an attempt to speak up a lady he likes, and he or she retains shutting him down, he’ll ultimately hand over below the guise that he by some means found she shouldn’t be his sort, is ugly, or has unhealthy tooth—something to return to phrases with the misery that failing to win her over causes.
Actually, rule of thumb is that the extra a man (or lady) goes on and on about how somebody is so not their sort, the extra probably that particular person is completely in love with them.
To cite Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
In Rwanda’s case, to bridge the contradiction of ramrod-straight Kagame seemingly bending the foundations requires some form of clarification – that Rwanda is a particular nation with a novel historical past, that Rwandans’ interpretation of democracy and constitutionalism is theirs to make, and so forth.
Factually, these explanations might all be legitimate and true. However an entire president – who has the entire of Rwanda solidly behind him – lashing out at a “nobody”, is a lifeless give away that the edifice shouldn’t be as formidable because it seems.